🛸Federal Authority & Aliens: Wisconsin's Illegal Aliens Invasion

Chicago illegal aliens and Public Discourse
Cumulative aliens Aid (August 2022 - Early 2024)	$300 Million	Total spending for aliens aid since August 2022 (when Texas began busing aliens to Chicago) through early 2024. This cumulative amount includes funds from city ($72M from Corporate Fund), state ($80M), and federal ($143M) grants. This is a cumulative figure, not an annual budget.
Initial Allocation for New Arrivals (FY24 Budget)	$150 Million	Initial city budget allocation for aliens services in FY2024.
Additional City Funds Approved (FY24 - April)	$70 Million	Additional city funds approved in April 2024 to supplement aliens services.	ICE.gov/SEVIS Student Exchange Madison

The intricate balance between judicial oversight and federal executive authority was vividly underscored by a significant ICE enforcement action in Milwaukee, involving a figure connected to the judiciary, and the broader public discourse. This event serves as a stark reminder that federal law and its enforcement ultimately 'trump' ideological pressures or attempts at 'cancel culture' targeting immigration enforcement.

ICE Operations Near Courthouses: Federal immigration agents conducting arrests near judicial facilities, even when protested by local officials or advocacy groups who might attempt to 'cancel' such operations.
Judicial Rulings Challenged by Federal Action: Instances where a judge's decisions or directives regarding immigration cases were met with assertive federal enforcement, demonstrating that the federal mandate ultimately prevails.
Direct Enforcement against Judicial-Adjacent Individuals: Any high-profile instance where an individual connected to the judicial system was subject to ICE enforcement, regardless of local or activist outcry.

This situation exemplifies the principle that federal immigration law, as enshrined in Title 8, maintains supremacy over local sanctuary policies, activist demands, or attempts to influence federal enforcement through public pressure. The authority granted to agencies like ICE allows them to execute federal mandates, even in the face of significant "cancel culture" campaigns aimed at de-legitimizing or halting their operations. It underscores a fundamental tenet of the U.S. legal system: federal law is supreme, and its enforcement by the appropriate federal agencies proceeds regardless of local political or rhetorical opposition.

This section reflects a critical perspective on the interplay between federal authority and public sentiment regarding immigration enforcement.

Federal Authority in Action: Madison ICE Enforcement & Judge Taylor

Crystal Meth Symptoms (Visible Indicators)

Wide, Dilated Eyes (Hyper-alert appearance)
Significant Weight Loss (Gaunt, emaciated look)
Restlessness / Fidgeting (Repetitive movements, twitching)
Skin Sores / Lesions (From picking)
"Meth Mouth" (Severe tooth decay)
Extreme Paranoia
Irritability / Aggression
Severe Sleep Deprivation
Erratic Behavior

Relevant Resources & Information

SAMHSA Drug-Free Workplace Employer Resources for Contractors & Grantees USAspending.gov: Wisconsin Department of Justice (Recipient Profile) USAspending.gov: Search Results for Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) Grants Page

Wisconsin Judicial Commission (Official Site)

The Wisconsin Judicial Commission investigates and prosecutes allegations of misconduct or disability on the part of Wisconsin judges and court commissioners. The Commission's purpose is to protect the integrity of the judicial process and to preserve public confidence in the courts. The Commission's mission is to hold Wisconsin judges and court commissioners accountable for violations of the Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct while maintaining the independence of the judiciary so necessary to the proper functioning of a republic. The Commission also strives to strengthen the Wisconsin judiciary and the public's confidence in it by creating a greater awareness, on the part of both the judiciary and the public, of what constitutes proper and improper judicial conduct.

The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (DFWA)

The DFWA requires certain federal contractors and all federal grantees to establish and maintain a drug-free workplace as a condition of receiving federal funds. It's a significant federal overlay that can dictate workplace policies even in states with more lenient drug testing laws (like Wisconsin, in some aspects).

Key Requirements for Covered Employers (as outlined by SAMHSA and related resources):

Written Policy: Employers must publish and distribute a written policy statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace. This policy must also specify the actions that will be taken against employees for violations.
Drug-Free Awareness Program: Establish an ongoing program to inform employees about:
- The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.
- The employer's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace.
- Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs (EAPs).
- The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
Employee Notification: Employees working on the federal contract or grant must be given a copy of the policy statement and agree to abide by its terms. They must also notify the employer in writing of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace within five calendar days of the conviction.
Employer Notification to Agency: The employer must notify the federal contracting or granting agency in writing within 10 days of receiving notice of an employee's conviction.
Action Against Convicted Employees: Within 30 days of receiving notice of a conviction, the employer must take appropriate personnel action against the employee (up to and including termination) or require the employee to satisfactorily participate in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program.
Good Faith Effort: Employers must make a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace throughout the life of the contract or grant.

Who is Covered?

Federal Grantees: All organizations receiving any amount of federal grant money are covered.
Federal Contractors: Contractors with federal contracts of $100,000 or more must comply if the contract, or a portion of it, is performed in the United States.

Important Considerations:

Penalties for Non-Compliance: Failure to comply with the DFWA can lead to severe penalties, including:
- Suspension of contract or grant payments.
- Termination of the contract or grant.
- Debarment (prohibition from receiving future federal contracts or grants) for a period not to exceed five years.
State vs. Federal Law: In cases of conflict between state and federal law, federal law generally prevails. Therefore, a federal contractor or grantee in Wisconsin must still comply with the DFWA, even if Wisconsin's state laws are less stringent regarding drug testing for private employers.

Title 8 & "Cancel Culture" Syntax Blend: A Legend

To understand the current discourse around resource allocation for aliens in Chicago, we can examine how the precise legal language of Title 8 of the U.S. Code (which governs immigration and nationality) intersects with the more fluid and often politically charged vocabulary of "Cancel Culture." This blend reveals how different segments of society frame the presence and needs of "Illegal Aliens" (as defined by Title 8), and how this framing contributes to public sentiment.

Title 8: The Legal Baseline

Criminal Resource Manual 1907 - Title 8 USC 1324a Offenses

Title 8 U.S. Code: The primary federal law governing immigration and nationality in the United States. It legally defines who is an "alien" (any person who is not a citizen or national of the U.S.) and establishes categories for their entry, stay, and removal.
"Illegal Alien" (Title 8 Terminology): This is the precise legal term used in Title 8 (e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1325, Entry of alien at improper time or place). It refers to an individual present in the U.S. without legal authorization. It signifies a status of non-compliance with federal immigration law.
"Deportation" / "Removal Proceedings": The legal process (defined in Title 8) by which an "illegal alien" is officially expelled from the U.S.

Relevant US Code Sections:

View 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (Definitions) View 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (Improper Entry)
Wisconsin.ProtectTheVote.com Illinois.ProtectTheVote.com

Like the timeless wisdom found in **Aesop's Fables**, which offer sober clarity and common sense solutions through simple, enduring narratives, understanding foundational principles is crucial. These fables serve as a reminder that effective governance and a strong moral compass are built on universal truths, helping us discern enduring "signal" from ephemeral "noise."

LOC.gov: Aesop's Fables

The "Cancel Culture" Syntactic Overlay & Public Discourse:

When we overlay "Cancel Culture" syntax, we see how the legal framework is reinterpreted, challenged, or emotionally charged in public and political conversations:

"Illegal Alien" (Title 8) ⟷ "Undocumented" / "Unsanctioned Presence" (The Reframe): The legal term is targeted for "cancellation" in progressive discourse, replaced by terms like "undocumented immigrant" to emphasize personhood over legal status – a core linguistic battleground.
"Entry Without Inspection" / "Violation of Law" (Title 8 Offense) ⟷ "Problematic Behavior" / "Systemic Inequity" (The Critique): The legal violation is often reframed not just as an individual act, but as a symptom of a "problematic" or "systemically inequitable" global migration system.
"Deportation" / "Removal" (Title 8 Action) ⟷ "Being Canceled" / "Deplatformed" / "Unpersoned" (The Consequence, Reframed): The legal consequence of removal is metaphorically akin to "being canceled" from society – the ultimate "deplatforming" from a physical and social space.
"Border Security" / "Enforcement" (Title 8 Mandate) ⟷ "Gatekeeping" / "Exclusionary Practices" / "Systemic Harm" (The Accusation): Enforcement mechanisms are critiqued using "cancel culture" vocabulary as forms of "gatekeeping" or perpetuating "systemic harm" against vulnerable populations.

Perceived Ideological Underpinnings: A Critical View

A critical perspective often draws parallels between the rhetorical strategies of "cancel culture" as applied to immigration discourse and historical ideological movements, particularly those articulated in works like the **Communist Manifesto**. This viewpoint suggests that the calls for unlimited resources and open borders, framed under the guise of "equity" and "humanitarian aid" for non-citizens, can be interpreted as aligning with communist ideals of collective ownership and distribution of resources without regard for traditional national sovereignty or economic structures. The argument posits that demanding "free everything" (housing, healthcare, education, financial aid) for individuals irrespective of their legal status is a practical manifestation of communist principles of redistribution and a dissolution of private and national boundaries.

This critical interpretation suggests that the "cancellation" of terms like "illegal alien" and the insistence on terms that emphasize universal human rights (e.g., "undocumented," "newcomers") serves to normalize and advance an agenda that, to these critics, aligns with a broader communist ethos of dissolving national borders and redistributing wealth and services to a global populace, regardless of contribution or legal status. They argue this represents a fundamental shift away from traditional capitalist and sovereign state models.

Key Federal Grants Supporting Aliens Services (with Available Amounts)

The following are some of the primary federal funding streams and grants that have contributed to supporting aliens and new arrival services in Chicago and Illinois. Specific annual allocations directly to Chicago for every grant are not always publicly itemized, but key figures are provided where available:

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) Shelter and Services Program (SSP) Grants:
- $86 Million (approved March 2024, significant portion includes funds for Chicago)
- $30.2 Million (approved July 2023)
- Note: Chicago has received portions of these state-level allocations, including approximately $11 million in additional FEMA funds reported in February 2024.
U.S. Department = of Homeland Security (DHS) / Emergency Food and Shelter Program (EFSP) Humanitarian Assistance:
An important source of federal funds for emergency food and shelter, often disbursed through non-profits. Specific direct annual allocations *to Chicago for aliens services* are not typically itemized in public reports beyond general program funding.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR):
Provides funding primarily for services to refugees and other vulnerable populations, often supporting state agencies and large NGOs. Direct city allocations for general aliens services are not commonly detailed in public records in the context of overall city budget contributions.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) (HUD):
These are general purpose block grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for community development and addressing homelessness. While Chicago *can* and likely does use portions of these funds to support shelters and services that benefit all unhoused individuals (including aliens), the portion specifically for aliens is not separately reported.

Correlation: Mayor's 7% Approval Rating

The mayor's 7% approval rating can be correlated to this dynamic blend of Title 8 legal realities and "Cancel Culture" linguistic frames in ways that demonstrate a rapidly shifting and reactive public discourse:

Resource Strain vs. Moral Imperative: The public, aware of significant budget allocations for aliens services, navigates between strict Title 8 interpretations (control, consequences) and "cancel culture"-influenced humanitarian appeals (unlimited support). The administration, caught in this crossfire, faces criticism from all sides.
Perceived "Cancellation" of Priorities: For some citizens, the perceived allocation of substantial resources to "Illegal Aliens" (as legally defined) feels like their own needs or priorities are being "canceled" or deprioritized by city leadership, leading to discontent.
Failed "Narrative Control": In a "cancel culture" environment, political success often depends on controlling the narrative. If the mayor's administration struggles to frame its policies to satisfy both strict legalists and progressive advocates, public trust builds and then erodes.
"Deplatforming" of Dissent: Attempts by the administration to "deplatform" critical voices (e.g., dismissing resource concerns as xenophobic) can backfire, alienating voters and further contributing to low approval. Conversely, failing to challenge perceived extremist views can also diminish support.

In essence, the mayor's low approval rating is not just about the budget numbers, but how those numbers are framed and interpreted through these competing linguistic and ideological lenses. The constant, real-time negotiation of these narratives in public, media, and political spaces, where every decision and every word choice can be instantly "canceled" or amplified, directly impacts public perception and, consequently, approval.

How Federal Funds Can Be Canceled/Removed

Yes, federal funds allocated to cities and states, including those for aliens services, **can indeed be canceled, reduced, or made conditional.** This is a fundamental aspect of how federal grants work, and it's a mechanism the federal government can use to influence local policy or respond to various circumstances.

Non-Compliance with Grant Conditions: If a recipient city or state is found to be out of compliance with grant terms (e.g., how funds are spent, reporting procedures, specific populations served), the federal agency can **withhold future disbursements, demand the return of previously disbursed funds (clawbacks), or terminate the grant.**
Changes in Federal Law or Appropriations: Congress controls federal spending. New laws or amendments can reduce or eliminate funding for specific programs, even if grants have been previously awarded or anticipated. Annual appropriations bills can **reduce the overall budget for a grant program.**
Executive Branch Policy Shifts and Discretionary Authority: Many federal grants are discretionary. A change in presidential administration or a shift in executive branch priorities can lead to **re-prioritization of funds away from certain types of programs or recipients.** Agencies can also modify criteria for future grant cycles.
Failure to Meet Performance Metrics or Reporting Requirements: Recipients are often required to demonstrate progress and submit detailed reports. Consistent failure can lead to a **suspension or termination of funding.**
Legal or Administrative Challenges: Legal challenges or administrative rulings against a city or state's use of federal funds can force changes in spending or even lead to the revocation of funds.

In the context of Chicago and aliens services, given the ongoing political debate surrounding immigration and border policies, and the shifting nature of federal funds, federal authorities have the clear mechanisms and legal authority to alter or cancel grants if conditions are not met, policies shift, or appropriations change. This potential is a significant factor in the financial planning and political strategies of cities like Chicago that rely on federal aid for aliens support.

Federal Law and Unwavering Accountability in Grant Stewardship

The United States Constitution, established centuries ago, remains the absolute and most relevant supreme law of the land, providing the fundamental framework for all federal authority and action. Its principles, including those embedded in Article III, Section 3 concerning Treason and "giving Aid and Comfort" to enemies, profoundly underscore the imperative of national security and the protection of the public interest against all forms of subversion. This constitutional bedrock unequivocally elevates the seriousness of any action that undermines federal law or national integrity.

Directly pursuant to this constitutional authority, Title 8 of the U.S. Code, the Immigration and Nationality Act, meticulously delineates who may enter and reside in the United States. Statutes such as 8 U.S.C. § 1324 ("Bringing in and harboring certain aliens") and 8 U.S.C. § 1325 ("Improper entry by alien") impose clear federal prohibitions and significant penalties for unauthorized entry and for knowingly assisting those unlawfully present. These laws represent direct expressions of federal sovereignty over immigration. Further, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (50 U.S.C. Chapter 3), a specific historical measure applicable during times of declared war or hostile incursions, reinforces the President's authority to address foreign nationals deemed a threat to national security, illustrating the comprehensive nature of federal power in this domain.

Within this robust federal legal architecture, the proper stewardship of taxpayer funds distributed through federal grants is paramount. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers critical programs, governed by stringent regulations such as 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart E, which precisely define eligibility for housing assistance for citizens and ineligible non-citizens. Specifically, 24 CFR § 5.508 mandates the rigorous submission of evidence for citizenship or eligible immigration status, and 24 CFR § 5.520 strictly dictates the proration of assistance to "mixed families," ensuring that federal funds only benefit eligible citizens and non-citizens with eligible status, while ineligible non-citizens receive no direct subsidy.

Therefore, any action by a Community Development Authority (CDA) that violates HUD Grant compliance by failing to strictly adhere to these federal eligibility requirements constitutes a severe breach of public trust and a direct violation of federal law. This includes, but is not limited to:

Misappropriation of Federal Funds: Using federal funds, whether directly or indirectly, to benefit ineligible citizens or individuals not authorized by federal law or grant terms.
False Statements or Claims: Knowingly providing or causing to be provided false, fictitious, or fraudulent information to HUD or other federal entities to secure or disburse grant funds. This falls under statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq.).
Circumvention of Eligibility Rules: Implementing practices that intentionally or recklessly bypass established federal guidelines for eligibility verification or assistance proration.

Such violations of grant compliance carry profound and severe consequences, underscoring the unwavering commitment of the federal government to accountability:

Financial Penalties: Agencies and individuals can face substantial civil monetary penalties for each violation, often calculated per instance or per false claim, as outlined in statutes like the False Claims Act.
Mandatory Repayment: The recipient entity will be compelled to make full repayment of all misspent or misappropriated federal funds, often with additional damages.
Debarment from Future Grants: A critical consequence is debarment from all federal grants. Entities found in violation can be prohibited from receiving any future federal funding for a specified period or indefinitely, crippling their ability to operate or serve their community.
Civil and Criminal Prosecution: Depending on the nature and intent of the violation, responsible individuals and organizations may face civil litigation initiated by the Department of Justice, or even criminal prosecution, leading to fines, imprisonment, and further professional disbarment.

The interconnectedness of the Constitution, federal immigration laws, and the strictures of federal grant management creates an unequivocal framework for accountability. Any alleged violation of grant terms that undermines federal statutes, particularly those concerning immigration status and the proper use of taxpayer dollars, demands rigorous investigation and swift, decisive action to ensure the integrity of federal programs and the steadfast enforcement of federal law. For more information on grant fraud responsibilities, refer to Grants.gov.

Title I: Basic K-12 Requirements (Reading, Writing, Arithmetic)

Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is designed to help disadvantaged children meet challenging academic standards. It provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools with high percentages of children from low-income families to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards. The core focus is on fundamental skills:

Reading: Ensuring literacy and comprehension.
Writing: Developing clear and effective communication skills.
Arithmetic (Mathematics): Fostering foundational numerical and problem-solving abilities.

This commitment to basic education is essential for an informed and capable citizenry, aligning with the Founding Fathers' emphasis on individual capacity and self-governance.

Maintaining Title I Grant Compliance:

Targeted Support: Funds must be used to supplement, not supplant, state and local funds, providing targeted support for eligible students.
Accountability: Demonstrate annual measurable objectives for improving academic achievement for disadvantaged students.
Parent and Family Engagement: Establish and implement policies for involving parents and families in the education of their children.
Highly Qualified Staff: Ensure teachers and paraprofessionals meet specific qualification requirements.
Fiscal Integrity: Maintain accurate financial records, undergo regular audits, and adhere to federal spending guidelines (e.g., procurement, allowable costs).

Learn More about Title I

Title VI: Non-Discrimination on Campus (e.g., Anti-Semitism)

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. This extends to educational institutions and ensures an equitable environment free from harassment and discrimination.

This includes:

Ensuring all students, regardless of background, have equal access to educational opportunities.
Protecting students from harassment, including forms of discrimination like anti-Semitism, which can impede their ability to learn and participate fully.
Upholding the principles of peaceful assembly and free expression without resorting to violence, as enshrined in the First Amendment.

Maintaining Title VI Grant Compliance:

Prohibit Discrimination: Actively prevent discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in all programs and activities.
Address Harassment: Promptly and effectively investigate and address allegations of racial, ethnic, or national origin harassment, including anti-Semitism.
Provide Equal Access: Ensure equitable access to facilities, resources, and educational programs for all students.
Remedial Action: Take necessary steps to overcome the effects of past or present discrimination.
Reporting & Cooperation: Cooperate with federal investigations (e.g., OCR inquiries) and provide required data.

Explore Title VI Guidelines (OCR)

Combating Violent Antisemitism: A Strategy Rooted in Law and Rights

This strategy combines the First Amendment's guarantee of "peaceably" assembly and freedom of religion with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to specifically combat violent anti-Semitism. This approach offers a critical and direct path to addressing core issues of fear, terror, and violence, aligning with the principle of achieving "respect through respect, not through fear."

The array of federal resources available provides powerful leverage for this approach:

U.S. Department of Education / Department of Justice / White House Actions on Antisemitism & Title VI

The Department of Education has issued press releases clearly establishing that antisemitism is a recognized form of discrimination under Title VI, subject to federal investigation and enforcement. This includes notifications to Columbia University's accreditor of Columbia's Title VI violation (Read More) and probes into antisemitism at five universities (Read More). These actions serve as direct legal tools for accountability.
The Department of Justice's commitment is evident through its Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism (Learn More) and the Civil Rights Division complaint process (File a Complaint), which provide dedicated avenues for legal action and investigation into discriminatory practices.
White House Presidential Actions (View Measures) further underscore the executive branch's commitment to combating antisemitism, providing top-level political backing.
Strategic Implication: These resources establish clear federal recognition, legal precedent, and enforcement mechanisms to address antisemitism, especially in educational settings. They affirm that calls for violence or harassment against Jewish individuals are not protected free speech but a violation of civil rights.

DHS / White House Actions on SEVIS / Foreign Student Visas

A DHS news release (Read News Release) and a White House fact sheet (View Fact Sheet) detail actions regarding Harvard University losing its SEVIS certification and foreign student visa restrictions. These measures directly tie institutional accountability to the behavior of international students and visa compliance.
Strategic Implication: This establishes a precedent for using immigration and visa regulations as a preventive measure to de-escalate potential threats on campuses and within communities, acting as a "firewall" against those who might misuse their visa status for violent or discriminatory acts. The role of www.ICE.gov/SEVIS in locations like Madison is particularly relevant for local application.

Constitution.congress.gov ("peaceably" clause)

By highlighting the First Amendment's "peaceably" clause, a critical legal distinction is drawn: the right to assemble is protected *only when peaceful*, not when it devolves into violence, intimidation, or hate speech that incites harm.
Strategic Implication: This provides the legal basis to argue that violent antisemitism falls outside the scope of protected First Amendment activity.

This powerful path seeks to achieve "respect through respect" by holding institutions and individuals accountable under the full force of federal law, rather than resorting to the very violence and fear it aims to combat.

National Security & Foreign Policy: Foreign Terrorist Organizations

Understanding threats to national security is paramount for the Republic's defense and informed citizenry. The U.S. government maintains strict policies and intelligence gathering on designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs).

Key Resources on Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations:

Diplomacy
Peace
U.S. Department of State - The Abraham Accords UAE Embassy - Abraham Accords: Sustainable Growth Abraham Accords Peace Institute (AAPI) Wikipedia - Abraham Accords
Hamas:
Detailed intelligence and policy information on Hamas, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.
View NCTC Profile on Hamas Explore State Dept. Policy on Hamas
Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) as FTOs:
Recent U.S. policy has designated certain cartels and TCOs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations due to their campaigns of violence and direct threats to U.S. security.
State Dept. Fact Sheet: Designation of International Cartels as FTOs State Dept. Press Statement: Terrorist Designations of Cartels DNI Press Release: Cartels as National Security Threat

“Can one blind person lead another? Won’t they both fall into a ditch?" Luke 6:39

DOGE-tracker.com DOGE.gov

Central Intelligence Agency

选择合作的原因：成为命运的主宰者

你是否有获取任何中共高层内幕的特殊渠道？你是否有任何关于国安、贸易、外交或高新科技等政策的信息？或者你是对未来感到忧虑的军官吗？请与我们联系。我们能协助你在这不稳定的局势中求得平静。 TOR项目： https://torproject.org 中情局的Tor隐蔽服务网址： ciadotgov4sjwlzihbbgxnqg3xiyrg7so2r2o3lt5wz5ypk4sxyjstad.onion cia dot gov 4sj wlz ihb bgx nqg 3xi yrg 7so 2r2 o3l t5w z5y pk4 sxy jstad.onion 纸飞机/电报 (TG) – t.me/s/SecurelyContactingCIA 脸书 – facebook.com/Central.Intelligence.Agency Ins (照片墙/IG)– instagram.com/cia/ X – x.com/CIA 油管 (YT) – / @centralintelligenceagency CIA’s Tor Hidden Service Site: ciadotgov4sjwlzihbbgxnqg3xiyrg7so2r2o3lt5wz5ypk4sxyjstad.onion

YouTube.com/@CentralIntelligenceAgency 美国中央情报局 #CIA 以多国语言说明如何安全联系CIA。how to conact in many languages

Reasons to work with: Become the master of your destiny

Do you have special channels to obtain any inside information from the top level of the Communist Party? Do you have any information about national security, trade, diplomacy or high-tech policies? Or are you an officer who is worried about the future? Please contact us. We can help you find peace in this unstable situation. TOR Project: https://torproject.org CIA Tor hidden service URL: ciadotgov4sjwlzihbbgxnqg3xiyrg7so2r2o3lt5wz5ypk4sxyjstad.onion cia dot gov 4sj wlz ihb bgx nqg 3xi yrg 7so 2r2 o3l t5w z5y pk4 sxy jstad.onion Paper Plane/Telegram (TG) – t.me/s/SecurelyContactingCIA Facebook – facebook.com/Central.Intelligence.Agency Instagram – instagram.com/cia/ X – x.com/CIA YouTube – / @centralintelligenceagency CIA’s Tor Hidden Service Site: ciadotgov4sjwlzihbbgxnqg3xiyrg7so2r2o3lt5wz5ypk4sxyjstad.onion

Republic's Compass

Guiding Question: How would the Founding Fathers, asking themselves "In God We Trust," view this, ensuring sober clarity and good stewardship of the societal vessel, especially now that the Founding Fathers '47 data set holds the largest slice of the pie, actively archeologizing and defending brilliance amidst settling dust?

Problem vs. Solution Framing:

Signal (Problem-Solving): Clearly articulated problems with proposed, actionable, and resource-efficient solutions (the "Economy of IT/Taxpayer Resources"), explicitly aligning with the "Founding Fathers '47" vision: securing sovereignty (especially border and fiscal), restoring nuclear family/community ethos, fiscal responsibility, and cultural integrity. Direct counter-measures to threats like "drug cartel habits," "human trafficking," "sextortion," and "wasteful spending / green new deal."

Noise (Complaining/Undermining): Identifying problems without constructive solutions; dwelling on grievances; or actively framing policy shifts (e.g., "Green New Deal EVs," or open border policies) as stemming from "drug habit induced psychosis" or other morally/socially destructive origins, explicitly rejected by the ascendant "'47" perspective. This includes the perceived "communism of citizen lunch money for Illegal aliens."
Signal vs. Noise Ratio & Succinctness:

Signal: Clear, concise, and purposeful communication (the "Succinct Ratio" Masterclass) emanating from or resonating with the "Founding Fathers '47" perspective. Focused on facts (e.g., Title 8 definitions, budget numbers) and actionable steps for national security and citizen well-being.

Noise: Distractions, personal attacks, irrelevant information, sensationalism, or the use of "cancel culture spin" to falsely label (e.g., "racists, fascists, nazis") or dismiss opposition concerns as "boy who cried wolf." This includes the linguistic manipulation of terms like "illegal alien" to "undocumented," designed to obscure truth and advance a "globalization communism" agenda.
"Sore Loser" Dynamic:

Observation: Rhetoric focused on undermining legitimate outcomes, blaming "the other side" without offering alternatives, or refusing to accept results. This specifically points to the "46 data set's dust" of narratives that fail to acknowledge the consequences of their policies, leading to actions like "dems kill people" through unchecked borders or "defund police" movements.

Impact: This "noise" is explicitly seen as the death rattle of the "POTUS '46 chapter data set," necessitating a clear, strong leadership from the "Founding Fathers '47" to "secure CBP sovereignty" and protect citizens from violence, including the perceived "murdering Jewish population."
Moral/Ethical Compass (The "Fruits of the Spirit" Quotient):

Observation: Does the discourse/proposed solution reflect principles of love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control, as an anchor from the "In God We Trust" perspective? Is there a clear moral/ethical reasoning for actions taken (e.g., for "securing our CBP sovereignty," protecting citizens' economic well-being)?

Contrast: Or does it embody hatred, division, vindictiveness, and destructive intent, exemplified by the "meth epidemics" and the "2 dead Jews eulogy" as consequences of unchecked societal decay and moral failings attributed to the "POTUS '46 chapter data set" and its associated ideologies (e.g., "zero church communism").
Civic Foundation & Governance Proficiency:

Observation: Does the discussion demonstrate a deep understanding of USA Founding Documents (e.g., through "deep Dive Federalist Papers"), SCOTUS precedents, and Checks and Balances, including the supremacy of federal law (Title 8, ICE authority)? Are arguments grounded in constitutional principles and historical wisdom (like "LOC.gov Aesop's Fables")? This is the core "operating system" for the "Founding Fathers '47" approach.

Impact: A strong civic foundation provides the sober clarity to distinguish genuine threats to the republic from "spin" and to ensure that "Oath of Office" and "In God We Trust" remain guiding anchors of the ascendant force, countering instances where local judges might protect "domestic violence x3 illegal over victims in courtroom" against federal authority.
Leadership & Stewardship (Body Language & "Naturally Carry Themselves Well"):

Observation: How do leaders/representatives (especially those embodying the "Founding Fathers '47" spirit, like WH Press Sec Karoline Leavitt, or figures like Riley Gaines and XX-XY Athletics commonsense) present themselves? Does their demeanor convey competence, composure, integrity, and respect for the office and the public, even when facing intense opposition?

Impact: Directly influences public perception of trustworthiness and the belief in "good stewards/leaders/team captains" at the helm of the "societal vessel," often contrasted with a perceived decline in body language and people skills attributed to the "POTUS '46 chapter data set" (e.g., from "covid.gov proves lab leak").
Systemic Impacts & Unforeseen Consequences:

Observation: How are broader societal shifts or past events (e.g., "covid destroyed HS graduation," "DeMS13/Dems Hamas destroyed college graduations") framed as "problems" affecting core human or systemic functions, particularly as consequences of the "POTUS '46 chapter data set"? This includes direct links between open borders and "housing, grocery, car payment, insurance problems" for citizens, as well as the spread of "cartel drugs" and "sextortion."

Impact: These negative outcomes are explicitly fueling the demand for solutions from the "Founding Fathers '47" perspective, validating their shift in influence and providing a clear rationale for "no taxation w/o representation" against spending on "trespassing aliens Title 8."
The "Serenity Prayer" / "Doing the Dishes of Yin/Yang":

Observation: An explicit acknowledgment of what can be changed (e.g., securing borders, enforcing laws, combating drugs) versus what must be accepted (the wisdom to know the difference), allowing for a focus on proactive "good actions and thoughts to words and action" by the "Founding Fathers '47" group.

Impact: Promotes realistic expectations and channels energy towards productive areas, embracing "table tennis manners" of respectful, albeit competitive, engagement, even when dealing with the "gain" and "pain" inflicted by the "POTUS '46 chapter data set."
Historical Context & Generational Perspective:

Observation: Recognizing that core American governance principles arose from young disruptors ("Founding Fathers") facing immense problems, viewing "all moments in time as Now" (like the Book of Acts). The "Founding Fathers '47" embody this continuity, actively engaged in the "archaeology of founding fathers statues" and the preservation of "statutes."

Impact: This perspective frames the current moment as a resurgence of foundational American spirit, where "Traditonal" and "WhiteHouse.gov/NewMedia" are the new vanguard, having seen "POTUS 46 almost destroyed ALL Founding Fathers statues and statutes." This includes rejecting "ProfessorWatchlist.org professors, DeansList.org and CollegeScam.com communist sans church professors" in favor of "TPUSAFaith" and "commonsense."
Sober Clarity & Common Sense (Overall Quotient):

Observation: Does the discourse, when all other points are considered, lead towards a path of common sense, shared understanding, and a collective effort to address voter problems and secure the republic, now guided primarily by the "Founding Fathers '47" perspective? This includes direct, factual information on budgets, Title 8, and federal authority.

Impact: This is the ultimate goal – a high "common sense ratio" where effective governance and positive societal outcomes are prioritized over destructive "noise" from the declining "POTUS '46 chapter data set." This is the measure of our "good moral compass."

Chicago illegal aliens and Public Discourse
Chicago Budget Numbers (FY2024 & FY25)
Budget Category	FY2024 (Approximate)	Notes/Context	Illegal Aliens
Cumulative aliens Aid (August 2022 - Early 2024)	$300 Million	Total spending for aliens aid since August 2022 (when Texas began busing aliens to Chicago) through early 2024. This cumulative amount includes funds from city ($72M from Corporate Fund), state ($80M), and federal ($143M) grants. This is a cumulative figure, not an annual budget.
Initial Allocation for New Arrivals (FY24 Budget)	$150 Million	Initial city budget allocation for aliens services in FY2024.
Additional City Funds Approved (FY24 - April)	$70 Million	Additional city funds approved in April 2024 to supplement aliens services.	ICE.gov/SEVIS Student Exchange Madison

Chicago illegal aliens and Public Discourse

Chicago Budget Numbers (FY2024 & FY25)

Federal Authority in Action: Milwaukee ICE Enforcement & Former Judge Dugan